Technical AI Safety Research

A specialist system for technical AI safety research.


Math, law, and finance each have specialist systems that outperform general-purpose frontier models on the work that matters most. TAISR is that system for technical AI safety — built around the corpus, taxonomy, evidence discipline, and workflows the field actually uses.

Why specialize

Specialist systems beat generalists in field after field for the same structural reason: they exploit the shape of one domain rather than averaging across many.

01 — Corpus

Domain corpus and curation

A continuously curated technical AI safety corpus with explicit scope and provenance discipline — not a thin slice of a generalist academic index.

02 — Discipline

Evidence and claim discipline

Outputs distinguish supported, weakly supported, contradictory, and unresolved claims. Methodological disagreement is preserved, not smoothed into a single tidy summary.

03 — Structure

Workflow structure

Built around the canonical jobs of safety research rather than a blank chat box — synthesis, comparison, review, challenge, each first-class.

Workflows

The work TAISR is built for.

01 — Synthesis

Literature synthesis

Draw together the evidence on a research question, with provenance and methodological caveats preserved rather than averaged away.

02 — Comparison

Benchmark and evaluation comparison

Compare safety-relevant benchmarks and evaluations across models and methods, with their known caveats made explicit.

03 — Review

Safety-case and reporting review

Review safety arguments and technical reports for completeness, evidence support, and the gaps a careful reviewer should flag.

04 — Challenge

Challenge and rebuttal review

Examine objections to a claim, surface live methodological disagreement, and find counter-evidence the original argument did not address.

Private pilot

Access is invitation-only while we onboard the first cohort of collaborators.

For independent and grant-funded technical AI safety researchers, frontier-lab safety and evaluations teams, AI governance and standards groups, and institutions funding or supervising technical AI safety work.

We respond personally to every request. No marketing list, no automated drip.

We onboard in small batches. Replies typically within a week.